When coming to terms with the mind and ones' self and vision of the world, several complex questions are answered with biased answers. Professions revolving around the term "psychology" are developed, either to help the general populace understand the function and usage of the mind or to assist troubled individuals in "fixing" their views of the world around them.

​

If you were to describe this effect--a desire to understand and then to change someone--you could get arguments around removing one's "uniqueness"... to change someone's mind is to change them even under the pretense of "fixing" or "helping".

If you change how one sees the world,

are you a therapist?

Intent only on the positive

well-being of your clients,

of the general populace?

​

Or are you a dictator in a micro-managed land?
Not one person can be out of order.
Not one mind unalike.

Not one unique eye in a cursed dystopian land...

​

To answer this question, to even consider it begs another question deeming an answer...

​

..are the two truly so different?